LIVELIHOOD SECURITY

The real thing takes weeks to make. A copy takes hours, and still outsells it.

Across Uttar Pradesh and Rajasthan, artisans spend days or weeks producing handloom sarees, hand-knotted rugs and natural-fibre weaves that machine-made copies can imitate in a fraction of the time, and often undercut on price. India's handloom sector alone employs an estimated 3.5 million weavers and allied workers, concentrated in clusters where a single skill, passed within families over generations, is the entire household income. Tri-Impact works with these communities, from Varanasi's saree weavers to Rajasthan's rug makers and the Tharu women weaving Moonj grass, to build the market protections, certifications and buyer connections that make authentic production pay.

An embroidery and textile worker in one of Tri-Impact's Uttar Pradesh production communities.
THE GAP

Skill the market can't see.

The market cannot tell an authentic product from a counterfeit, so it stops paying for the difference, and the people who hold the skill are leaving it.

A handloom weaver in Varanasi takes days or weeks to produce a Banarasi saree in pure silk, using a technique no machine can fully replicate. A power loom produces a visually similar polyester imitation, sold under the same name, in a fraction of the time and cost, and most buyers cannot tell the two apart at the point of sale. The Banaras brocades and sarees Geographical Indication tag, registered in 2009 to protect production from five Uttar Pradesh districts, was meant to close that gap. More than fifteen years on, imitation volumes have kept growing, and a genuine weaver still typically receives only a fraction of the final retail price, most of it absorbed further up the chain.

The erosion compounds across generations. Ministry of Textiles handloom census data puts the national weaving workforce at around 26 lakh by 2020, down from 43.31 lakh in 1995, a decline of roughly 38 percent. The same census found 67 percent of handloom workers earning less than ₹5,000 a month, and only 1.2 percent earning more than ₹20,000. At that income, choosing not to weave is a rational decision, made by the generation whose parents and grandparents built the technique certification is meant to protect.

Janul Abdeen, 60, a handloom weaver in Dhamaria, Lohata, Varanasi, at his loom.
WHAT WE DO

Fixing both sides of the market.

Two problems, addressed together: buyers who cannot verify authenticity, and artisans who cannot access the systems that would prove it.

Livelihood Security moves on two fronts at once. One builds the consumer and buyer awareness that makes authenticity a purchasing decision rather than a guess. The other gets weavers and artisan-led micro-enterprises through the certification and market-access systems that convert that awareness into higher, more reliable income.

A Tri-Impact consumer and buyer awareness session on distinguishing authentic handwoven textile from power-loom imitation.

Consumer and buyer awareness

Public education distinguishing authentic handwoven textile from power-loom imitation, and direct engagement with buyers and institutional audiences on what Geographical Indication and Silk Mark certification actually protect.

Silk Mark and Geographical Indication certification marks used to verify authentic handloom production.

Certification and market protection

Working with the Silk Mark Organisation of India in Varanasi to connect weavers and cluster-level micro-entrepreneurs to Silk Mark and GI certification, and to navigate the administrative process that keeps most individual artisans from accessing it unassisted.

Authenticated handloom production placed directly with institutional and public buyers at a Tri-Impact market-access event.

Building market access

Direct funding and market placement for artisan-led micro-enterprises, connecting authenticated, documented production with buyers, exhibitions and institutional audiences who will pay for provenance.

CERTIFICATION & MARKET PROTECTION

Certification, made reachable.

A certification only protects income if the artisan producing the work can actually get it.

The Silk Mark, issued by the Silk Mark Organisation of India, and the Geographical Indication tag covering Banaras brocades and sarees, are real, government-backed protections that let a producer command a premium and give buyers a verifiable mark of authenticity. The registration process itself involves paperwork, documentation and institutional steps built for a business with administrative capacity, not an individual weaver or a small cluster of home-based artisans. Tri-Impact works directly with the Silk Mark Organisation of India in Varanasi to do that administrative navigation, connecting weavers and micro-entrepreneurs to certification that would otherwise stay out of reach.

Tri-Impact also runs direct consumer and buyer awareness work explaining how to distinguish authentic handwoven silk from power-loom imitation, and what Geographical Indication and Silk Mark certification actually verify. Awareness on its own does not raise an artisan's income. Paired with certification access, it gives that certification an audience that knows to look for it.

VIDEO

How a buyer tells an authentic handwoven Banarasi from a power-loom imitation, and what certification is actually verifying.

Plays from YouTube. Nothing loads from YouTube until you press play.
5districts

Uttar Pradesh districts carrying Geographical Indication protection for handloom brocades and sarees: Varanasi, Chandauli, Bhadohi, Mirzapur and Azamgarh, the certification base this work builds on.

BUILDING MARKET ACCESS

From certified to sold.

Certification creates the right to a premium. Someone still has to connect the product to a buyer who will pay it.

Tri-Impact funds and places authenticated production directly, rather than stopping at certification and awareness alone. Through the Hyundai Motor India Foundation's Art for Hope programme, five micro-entrepreneurs leading teams of roughly fifty handloom weavers received direct funding to produce pure-silk Banarasi sarees using traditional brocade technique. The model works through micro-entrepreneurs coordinating small production teams rather than individual weavers in isolation, because a cluster with a documented process and a market relationship can sustain itself once the funding ends, in a way an individual artisan usually cannot. That production was placed directly in front of buyers, not left to find a market on its own: an exhibition of the funded work, alongside a documentary on the weaving process and a public talk on authentic-versus-counterfeit textile identification, reached an audience of institutional and public visitors in New Delhi.

Tri-Impact has also profiled Jaipur Rugs, a Rajasthan-based rug manufacturer working with over 40,000 artisans, 35,000 of them women, as an example of what design-led market innovation can do for artisan income at scale. Jaipur Rugs' Manchaha programme turns weavers' own sketches and leftover yarn into designer rugs sold at a premium, rather than treating creative input as the designer's role alone and the weaver's as execution only, including an extension of the same model working with prison inmates.

VIDEO

A new income stream built from a material most people treat as waste.

Plays from YouTube. Nothing loads from YouTube until you press play.
5micro-entrepreneurs,
~50 weavers

Funded directly through the Art for Hope programme to produce and place authenticated Banarasi silk production in front of institutional and public buyers.

WHY NOW

Buyers are already asking for proof.

International buyers are being pushed toward documented, traceable production, whatever happens to any one directive.

That regulation is confirmed. A separate proposal, the Green Claims Directive, which would have required brands to substantiate environmental claims before making them, was reported in mid-2025 as heading toward withdrawal by the European Commission after member-state objections, though its status remains procedurally unresolved and should not be treated as settled in either direction. What is consistent across both is the direction of travel: buyers are increasingly expected to show where a product came from and who made it, not simply to tell a good story about it. Handloom production that is Geographical Indication-registered, Silk Mark certified, and tied to a documented micro-entrepreneur or artisan producer group already carries the kind of paper trail this shift rewards. Power-loom imitation, by construction, does not.

2026 to 2027

The window in which the EU's Ecodesign for Sustainable Products Regulation, already in force, rolls out product-specific traceability rules to the largest export market for certified textile production.

QUESTIONS

Common questions.

What does the Geographical Indication tag actually protect?

It legally restricts the description "Banaras brocades and sarees" to handloom production from five named Uttar Pradesh districts, giving buyers a verifiable basis to distinguish authentic handwoven product from an imitation made elsewhere or by power loom.

Is a certification like Silk Mark or GI enough on its own to raise artisan income?

Not by itself. Certification creates the legal basis for a premium. It does not automatically get an individual weaver through the registration process, or connect a certified product to a buyer willing to pay for it. Tri-Impact's work addresses both of those gaps directly, rather than assuming certification alone will close them.

How is this different from a general artisan-welfare programme?

This work is scoped specifically to market access and income: certification navigation, buyer and consumer awareness, and direct funding connected to a documented market outcome. Health, financial inclusion and social protection for the same worker communities are addressed through Tri-Impact's Decent Work programmes.

Where does this work happen?

Currently concentrated in Varanasi and its surrounding Uttar Pradesh handloom districts, and in Rajasthan through profiled partner organisations, within the same broader geography (Uttar Pradesh, Rajasthan, NCR and Uttarakhand) where Tri-Impact's other focus areas operate.

Does this include the Natural Colour Repository or natural-dye work?

No. Natural dye documentation and training is part of Climate Action, presented on its own Natural Colours page, since it sits at the intersection of ecological restoration and artisan skill rather than market access and income specifically.

How does Livelihood Security connect to Tri-Impact's other focus areas?

These focus areas are not run in isolation. A worker's health affects household income, income affects whether a family can wait for a fair price instead of selling to the first buyer, and market pressure on wages bears on the same worker communities that Decent Work's health and social-protection programmes reach. A single artisan household may be evidence for more than one focus area at once.

Why does a European regulation matter to a weaver in Varanasi?

Export buyers increasingly need to document where a product came from and who made it before they can sell it into markets moving toward stricter traceability requirements. A weaver whose product already carries Geographical Indication and Silk Mark certification is easier for that buyer to source from than one who cannot prove either. The certification and documentation work described above is what makes that connection possible.

Put authentic production in front of the buyers who will pay for it.

For CSR teams, funders and brands ready to connect certified, documented production with a market that recognises its value.

Your enquiry goes to the Tri-Impact team and is kept as a record, as the Privacy Policy explains.